Last night, I went to see Beowulf with a bunch of my unsavory pals. This was our third attempt to put together a group of people to see it, but third time is a charm and there ended up being around a dozen of us including Blue Blood hotties Scar 13, Tassy Pink, Joel Awesome, and Kitty Von Klau, Blue Blood Creative Director Forrest Black, Allan Amato who shoots for Scar13.com and more. It was kind of cool because it seems like it is becoming less common to have a bunch of people get together for something simple like seeing a movie. Yes, I’m thinking of going to see a movie with naked vikings fucking water sprites as a wholesome activity. You have to consider what the rest of my existence is like to put it in context.
We saw Beowulf at the Arclight so we could view the 3D version. The Arclight has extra-comfy chairs and prides itself on its high tech theater equipment. This is Los Angeles, so the front hall featured a display with actual costumes worn by actors in the movie. I sort of thought they were all in motion suits and they made the flick video game style, but I guess physical outfits were involved at some point. I liked the clothing anyway. I think I need to start wearing a royal cape around. The Arclight personnel handed us 3D glasses on the way into the theater.
Spoiler alert: If you didn’t read Beowulf in school (or at any other point), then the rest of this might include spoilers. I studied all the Icelandic sagas in school. When I was in college, I actually took a class called “Kinship and Law in Medieval Iceland.” And now it is my job to do things like write up the Beowulf movie. I guess I wasn’t wasting time and money at university after all. Phew.
Most of the Scandanavian sagas came from many troubadours through oral tradition and they were about heroism and adventure. And possibly about the fact that vikings tended to drink mead stored in flasks which were fabulous breeding grounds for hallucinogenic fungus. Beowulf, by contrast, believed to be by one author of English or German origin, is almost a satire of the saga genre. In the book, it is unclear whether the hero Beowulf or the monster Grendel is really the protagonist. Grendel is a sympathetic monster and some scholars feel that he represents nature in the epic battle between man and nature. It seems like, in these environmentally conscious times, the movie makers would have hit the green message a bit harder. Personally, I buy recycled where I can, even if it costs a bit more. But I roll in a big American car and I leave my air conditioning on when it is hot, whether or not I’m home. So this didn’t exactly damage my enjoyment of the movie.
The main deviation from the original poem is in the nature of Beowulf’s relationship with Grendel’s mother. Scholars disagree vehemently with one another on whether Grendel’s mother was a heroic female warrior who, in response to the killing of her son, simply carried out the requirements of blood feud and debt. Or whether this descendant of Cain was monstrous in appearance. In the poem, Beowulf is described as killing her with a magical sword and then using that same sword to decapitate Grendel’s corpse and bring his head back to the mead hall. It is entertaining to think that the screenwriters looked at this and wondered why the warrior would have only brought back one head if he had slain two monsters. Their explanation might not be so true to the original, but many things can be explained by Angelina Jolie’s wet, buoyant, gold-slicked, CGI boobies. Many scholars believe that the original Beowulf poem was a Christian propagandist restructuring of familiar tales to impose Christian values on them. So one can hardly blame a modern retelling for imposing current rules of cinematic story structure on the film. Beowulf’s relationship with Grendel’s mother not only allowed Robert Zemeckis to bring us hot naked viking/water sprite sex, but it also honestly ties the Grendel portion of the Beowulf saga and the dragon portion together much more neatly, for modern sensibilities, than the original does. Some feminist scholars argue that Beowulf has a three part story structure where the battle with Grendel’s mother is as important as the one with Grendel and the one with the dragon, although the story is generally viewed as having a two part structure. It would probably be reaching to call the Zemeckis adaptation a feminist retelling, but it is tidy modern story structure for a modern audience.
Much as the original saga was almost making fun of the braggadocio of its predecessors, the Beowulf movie is sold as a costume adventure blockbuster, but it points out that maybe the adventures just are not really that great. When Beowulf kills Grendel, the monster is tragic and, despite Beowulf’s humorous and aesthetically pleasing nudity, the warrior comes off as a bully, brutalizing a monster who is no match for him. It is uncomfortable to watch and the monster takes an agonizingly long time to die in his mother’s arms.
The movie pretty immediately switches tone from a certain almost cheesy brashness to a dismal and depressing ever after. The plot goes briskly from the warrior king yelling “I am Beowulf!” Flava Flav style to telling his young slave girl that none of it was as great as it should have been, not the battles, not the treasures, not the kingdom, not the women. She seems distressed that not even the women excited him in a particularly pleasant way, but he pretty much confirms that he can’t even summon interest in sex.
Beowulf set out to do battle for glory rather than gold, but he has acquired both through his exploits. Beowulf’s closest companions revere him. He is a king. He has wealth and many followers. People keep telling him that his praises will be sung after everything then alive has turned to dust. But, basically, nothing feels good.
Unusually, for a Hollywood blockbuster, the writers of the movie get top billing in the closing credits. The screenplay was written by the very impressive duo of Neil Gaiman and Roger Avary. Neil Gaiman is very well known in comic book and science fiction and fantasy circles. If you are gothic, you are probably familiar with his Sandman comic (or should probably at least fake like you are.) If you are more fandom-identified, then his somewhat tongue-in-cheek novels may be more your thing. Although Quentin Tarantino is the name everyone knows from Pulp Fiction, Roger Avary also has a screenwriting credit on it and has said in interviews since that he can’t hang out with Quentin Tarantino because the man just sucks the ideas right out of him. Roger Avary is probably best known for having written and directed the solid film adaptation of one of my favorite books, Bret Easton Ellis’ Rules of Attraction, (which Forrest Black and I shot some promo for with Scar 13 years ago.) There is some buzz about whether the technology involved in making Beowulf will ultimately somewhat replace actors, or at least turn them into licensable clip art. I will be interested to see if this sort of technology will ultimately mean that writers and scenic designers and people like that will receive more credit for how a movie turns out. Before I knew anything about how Hollywood works, it used to trouble me, as a consumer, that whether or not I enjoyed a movie depended very much on plot and story structure, only movies were never advertised as “written by the guy who wrote that other thing you liked.” A great actor with a horrid plot is generally Michael Madsen in that awful poker movie which comes on late night cable only. No Oscars there.
Perhaps because the original Beowulf saga mocked the more traditional sagas, although the movie is marketed as an epic adventure for fantasy fans, it feels almost like the viewer is being told that what they were coming to see is not as terrific as they might think. After the credits ran, most of my group of mighty thanes went to get shabu shabu. Everyone kept asking each other if they liked the movie. Except for Scar, who had promised to dislike the movie beforehand, no one seemed to know if they felt like it was a good movie or a bad one or somewhere in between. I know the film left me feeling a little extra aggro such that I wanted to attack the waitress when I asked her for a sparkling Voss water the seventh time. Not that people doing their job badly doesn’t annoy me normally, but not in such a visceral way. I think Joel Awesome and I might have been the only ones who were somewhat familiar with the saga genre. (Wait until you all see the super hot signature couples set of Joel and Kittie which Forrest and I shot for BlueBlood.com. All that hotness and smart and well-read too!) I think the movie was well-done and technologically interesting, but, being familiar with the original, I was mostly sort of kicking myself for being surprised that it was not a feel-good movie.
The message of the Beowulf movie seemed very much: “Look upon my works, ye mighty, with 3D glasses, and despair.” (Joel says that, when he was little, he used to confuse Gilgamesh and Grendel, so I can stick Ozymandius in my Beowulf if I want.) Fortunately, we had to give the 3D glasses back to the Arclight after the movie. It was disorienting, at first, to look at the world without them.
Harlan Ellison was going to be doing some sort of screening and question and answer session tonight. I realized that it had been about a decade since I read anything by Ellison, meaning I pretty much stopped reading his work when I came out to the West Coast. Although books are a serious vice of mine, Angelenos do not tend to be big readers and this makes it easy to just sort of not think of some writers I once would have been hyper-aware of.
At any rate, some friends and I went to see a sort of documentary/promo piece for Harlan Ellison tonight. It was a potentially not quite final cut and of course it was a book event in Los Angeles. I was all fretting, when we arrived with only three minutes to spare, that it might be sold out. Oh yeah, book event in sunny Southern Cali. It was only about a quarter full, but the audience struck me as quite devout, despite Ellison heckling us all during the Q&A portion, comparing our relative silence to a boring Jackson Pollack painting or something. I don’t recall the exact analogy, but, even though it did not quite work for the situation, it still sounded fairly entertaining the way Ellison said it.
The movie had a lot of delightfully well-delivered lines and a few bright spots. Writer Neil Gaiman describes a telephone answering machine message where Ellison told Gaiman he was a dead man, that his house would be burned down, salt would be poured on the radioactive remains, etc. and finishes saying “call me” and Gaiman tells the story with surprisingly humorous delivery. Actor Robin Williams wanders in and out of the flick and of course it is no surprise that he brings the funny. The biopic begins with Robin Williams asking Harlan Ellison a series of true/false questions. Each question features an outrageous incident which the author then confirms is true, sometimes with footnotes. Finally, Robin Williams asks Harlans Ellison if it is true that he slept with 500 women and bragged about it. Ellison replies that this is false. Wait a beat. Then he caveats that he actually slept with 700 women.
Ellison describes the way Warner Bros asked him to let them use an interview with him in the behind the scenes DVD for a science fiction show. Ellison asked them to pay him. They got peeved. He tried to get them to at least send him the DVD he is on and they told him to buy it and finally sent him the wrong DVD, by, uhm, accident no doubt. (The saavy director points out during the Q&A that he thinks it is cute that Ellison can believe that was an accident.) Ellison explains he needs to get paid for his work, even if the work is an interview with him for a DVD extra, and he doesn’t take a piss without getting paid for it. I am personally sick to death of people who want to make money off of other people’s entertainment value and are hostile to the notion of even comping anyone, much less compensating them. It was nice to hear Ellison describe making the lives of those who exploit in this fashion just a little bit harder. I couldn’t help but think, though, that he probably could have written something cool in the time he spent fighting over a single copy of a DVD. And, of course, if most people are happy to be interviewed for BTS extras for free, then the going rate de facto is zip.
I was interested in the subject matter and I’m glad I went to see it, but overall the movie bummed me out. Here was someone I once worshipped and he just seemed so old and so discontent and so shticky. How can I have someone be a role model, if the path they took looks like it leads to a bad place? Although it is impressive that director Erik Nelson was able to put the project together at all, given its famously cantankerous subject, I kept wanting to re-light the interviews he did with Harlan Ellison. I felt like some of the disturbing and tragic way the author came across was probably the result of lighting choices and I was curious how he would come across in the Q&A portion. The Q&A kicked off early with an intoxicated gentleman from the audience interrupting to say he also liked the part about yelling at people at Warner Bros on the phone. I actually couldn’t make out precisely what he was saying about the movie giant, however, because Ellison was yelling at him because he incorrectly thought he was someone who posted mean things about a friend of his on the internet. Then other audience members asked Ellison about his dead father, about mortality and legacy, about what to do when your artistic dreams are really not panning out, and some other cheery topics. Even if I hadn’t been bummed already, that took the gloom a little farther.
There is a signing across the street at a pseudo-bookstore, after the Q&A. I have resolved that I will take a flattering picture of Ellison when I shoot him with the one of my companions who brought a book to be signed. My friend with the book and I and another pal wait for the fourth member of our party to come out of the theatre. Bizarrely, Ellison stops to chat with my friend. They have never met before and it is a really cool moment when my friend tells him that the first time he ever saw the word fuck in a book was Ellison’s short story “A Boy and His Dog.” It seems like Ellison is perhaps going to sign the actual edition of the specific book in question, which my friend has brought along, but he repeats my friend’s name and tells him he has to head across the street. Then he steps kind of into my personal space, looks at my other companion, then stares directly into my eyes and also bids farewell to something along the lines of “people he does not know at all.”
I look sadly after him and glumly mention that he never remembers me. I’ve met Harlan Ellison around half a dozen times over the years, yet he always oddly aggressively claims to have no recollection of me, despite our first meeting being very memorable, at least for me.
We go across to the bookstore and it is called Every Picture Tells A Story. The store’s niche is visually-oriented books, so a lot of their merchandise is collectible volumes and prints and beautifully-produced children’s books. If I were decorating a house, it might be a bitchin’ store, but it kind of freaks me out as a bookstore. They have many beautifully printed art books and limited edition prints and incredibly glossy children’s books. These are the sort of items an interior decorator would buy to give a room a certain flavor. The store has a good selection of books for appearance, but it does not appear to have much in the way of books for reading.
I look around for a new Ellison book to buy. Even though I have read no Ellison for a decade now, there are none. I own everything they have by him, except for a couple of art books and these are interesting mostly for their collectible value. I start thinking about the headspace I was in when I first discovered Ellison’s dark writing. We wait in line so my one friend can get his symbolically significant book autographed by Harlan Ellison. The line is good-sized for a book signing, but it is not so giant that it needs to take particularly long. I even think we might still make it to the Cabinet of Curiosities show in Silverlake later in the evening. Ellison chats extensively with most of the people in the line, all the while complaining about how stupid it is for anyone to want a signature in a book, that it is basically defacing the book. I semi-agree, but I’m hanging out with my friends and that is cool. Plus I’ve promised to take a photo of my one friend with the great author. There is a poster for Charlotte’s Web and we start talking about that and I mention how much the book upset me as a child. Then I start really thinking about how bad Charlotte’s Web made me feel as a little kid. Then I point out that certain kinds of nostalgia give me a stomach ache.
We are finally almost at the front of the line, but Ellison takes forfreakingever with the trio in front of us. He signs multiple books and does photos with them all and even answers questions about whether he really hates doing signings. Finally, Ellison goes to sign my friend’s book. I take out my camera and hold it by my side. Ellison tells the room that devices like digital cameras cost you. I point out that I’m pretty sure my camera has paid for itself. He looks nonplussed. My friend asks the great writer for tips on overcoming writer’s block. Ellison tells him that he personally never ever sends email or goes on the internet, although he is at pains to point out that there are five sites devoted to him, and there is only one he sometimes goes on. Ellison goes on to advise my friend that lower tech is the way to go. I realize that Ellison believes he writes speculative fiction and not science fiction, but, as an SF fan who discovered his work in the SF&F section of the bookstore, I find it dismal that he would limit his ability to benefit from technology and human progress. Ellison uses only a manual typewriter. He shows us a DVD a fan brought him of all the interviews he did with a beloved and now deceased interviewer. Ellison points out that he will never watch the DVD. I think, from what he said in the Q&A, that he prefers to watch Betamax, but I can only listen in horrified fascination. Then he shows us a flyer for a gallery show he says a fan gave him tonight saying he might like the art, but that he will throw the flyer out and never look at that inconsequential web site on it. I kind of think he says the site in question is Salon.com, but I don’t read the flyer and I’m not sure. One of my other companions, a successful cameraman, taps my arm to give him my camera, so he can get photos of us talking to Ellison. I shake him off because I don’t think Ellison likes being papparazzied.
So I ask the author if we can get a picture and prepare to turn my camera on. Ellison says, “no.” I look at him, sort of waiting for the rest of the sentence. I have a $20 bill stuck into the top of the cell phone pocket in my purse, on the theory that, if he doesn’t take a piss without getting paid for it, he might not take a photo either. But all he does is raise his voice and ask me what part of no I don’t understand. I start to walk away pretty bummed. I know, I know, Harlan Ellison can be a dick to fans and also the sky looks blue sometimes. But, in my fannish heart, I want him to be a righteous warrior, rather than a petty bully who justifies meanness as honesty.
And people just don’t usually forget me, not when they have interacted with me extensively. Plus it seemed weird that he went on and on to the guy in front of us about how he never forgets anyone he meets. So I turn around and point out to him that we have met like six times and even had dinner together and yet he never seems to remember me. He asks me if he tried to get in my pants. I am blindsided by the question, utterly unsmooth, and I stutter, “uhm, yes.” Flabbergasted by the whole interaction, I turn to his wife and point out that it was before they were married. After a bit more interaction, Harlan Ellison tells me that hand-feeding a girl cookies is not the same thing as trying to get in my pants and that the cookies in question were Hydrox rather than Oreos and that he remembers me perfectly and that it is just terrible that I would go around saying a thing like that. Uhm, he was the one who asked me. I certainly didn’t bring it up in front of his wife. That would have been rude. So what does one say to a surreal onslaught like his? Does he remember me or not? Why would he repeatedly tell me he does not remember our meeting, if he remembers it “perfectly”? If he does remember me, why the fuck would he ask me, in front of his wife, whether he tried to sleep with me, when he knows the answer? If he doesn’t remember me, why the fuck would someone that promiscuous ask a woman if he tried to get with her? What if I had turned out to be someone he fucked? Having turned it over in my mind for a while, I really have no idea.
I really think it would have cost him nothing to get his picture taken with my friend, after we had waited hours for it. Not doing so was pointlessly cruel and needlessly stingy.
And, of course, due to the Murphy’s Law of Unsmoothness, someone is shooting video of the whole signing. Due to a bizarre series of coincidences, most of my interactions with Harlan Ellison over the years have had an embarrassing number of witnesses and been recorded on audio and/or video.
Walking away from Every Picture Tells A Story, two things occur to me. The most important is that, for all his talk of just being a man about it and getting down to the brass tacks of writing, I’m not sure Harlan Ellison is really still writing. Did he take his hands off the typewriter keys when Keebler acquired Sunshine Biscuits and discontinued the Hydrox cookie? I think the only teleplay he has done, since the turn of the century, is The Discarded for Masters of Science Fiction and, in the book department, Every Picture Tells A Story appeared to have only new editions of older work. The second thing which occurs to me is that I’ve already written about my first meeting with the great author.
Below, you will find an article which first ran in Blue Blood in print in 1997, after the fourth or fifth time I ran into Harlan Ellison. The then most recently prior meeting was in the VIP area at a White Wolf party at a convention Harlan Ellison and I were both guests at. As it was already a theoretically exclusive gathering, it was the sort of situation where it would be normal to shake the hand of anyone friendly and ask who they were, but Ellison seemed oddly standoffish to me. For the unitiated, White Wolf is a roleplaying game company with a flagship product kind of like Dungeons & Dragons. They had grossed like three or four million bucks that year and were hoping to get into more standard genre book publishing. I could be slightly off on the figures, but these numbers are close. White Wolf paid Harlan Ellison like $200,000 to reprint some of his work. Unfortunately for them, Harlan Ellison found out that writer Michael Moorcock, creator of Elric, got a quarter mill, so he called up the company and pitched a fit. Although I was more into Ellison’s work than Moorcock’s, so I probably would have paid him more in White Wolf’s shoes, I also believe that, when a grown man makes a deal, his word should be his bond. I don’t think it is right to renegotiate because you realize you left some money on the table. And, in all fairness to those who chose to pay Moorcock more, inside sources familiar with the Borealis Legends imprint at White Wolf told me that the Moorcock did better for them in sales.
At the time, I viewed the great author Harlan Ellison as such a giant that I did not imagine anything I did could particularly touch him. Maybe it was really a bummer for him that I put our real life interactions in print. Maybe, the first time he met me, he waited up in his hotel room all night and is still pissed off that I never stopped by. In my mind, I absolutely did not reject him; I was just really young and inexperienced and starstruck. It might be better to have an anecdote where I could say I was such a badass, even then, that I tied Harlan Ellison to the headboard and rode him with my young cunt, like a teenage girl rides a pony, but, alas, it didn’t go down like that. Years after the fact, I figured, if he didn’t even remember me after being reminded, wasn’t even particularly interested in finding out my name, then how much could he possibly care what I had to say. I kind of feel that Ellison’s own words are some of what probably created my view that it would be okay to talk about such things. If the man slept with 700 women and talked about it, how much could it matter if he happened not to hit a 701st and she talked about it?
My friends and I go to a diner named Dolores and it is yummy and the conversation is good. I tell my friends I sometimes wish I were a boy.
And it fucking well was Oreos and not Hydrox.
When I was about seventeen, my friend Keith Kanik brought Harlan Ellison to my college to speak. Ellison did an informal talk with the Science Fiction & Fantasy Club in the afternoon and a more formal speech for the Jewish Lecture Series that night. (It was a total coincidence that Keith was a budget officer for both organizations, we swear.) At the time, my pleasure reading consisted primarily of Harlan Ellison collections of short stories, with the occasional longer work by Harlan Ellison thrown in. So I was excited to see the author speak, but that didn’t keep me from showing up late for the SF Club thing. I think maybe I had a class or something pesky like that. By the time I got there, the only seat free was the one next to Ellison. Lots of my classmates had seated themselves on the floor in order to avoid taking that seat, but I was born without the normal number of intimidated chromosomes.
So I sat down next to Ellison and he immediately started flirtatiously bantering with me and touching himself. (He claimed he wasn’t touching himself; he had a tear in his pants. But I wasn’t buying it.) What I didn’t know, because I had arrived late, was that my little pals were taping this whole exchange. So somewhere there is an audiotape of Harlan Ellison offering to fly me to Florida if I would fuck a flamingo while he watched. (Years later, I wrote to him and offered, but it turns out he was married by then.) As a result of discussing bestiality and such with our honored guest, I was invited to the dinner for Ellison and seated opposite him so he could play footsie with me or whatever. A number of people I liked were at the dinner, but there were also more than a few I didn’t. I shared my little opinions with Ellison on the car ride over. So when introduced to a member of the Wesleyan Clergy, Harlan Ellison goes, “I’ve heard so much about you.” “All good I hope,” says the clergyman with a guffaw. “Actually,” Ellison replies, “I heard you were an asshole.” Technically, I said the man was incompetent and devoid of compassion, but watching his face was still worth it. Harlan Ellison, unlike most celebrities, is exactly the way his readers would want him to be.
After the dinner, we rode over to Ellison’s lecture together after he had picked up some Oreos in order to increase audience participation. (He likes to throw cookies at an audience.) So it is dark and the two of us are in the back of my friend’s car and I’m eating cookies out of Ellison’s hand and he’s whispering in my ear, hot and wet, “I bet you’re kinky, I bet you’re kinky in bed, I bet you’re kinky as Hell . . .” Technically, he was right; he was just a little early. Somewhere there is a videotape of Harlan Ellison calling me a sex object in front of a lecture group, but I thankfully do not have a copy. Today, I would insist on at least some oral sex for a statement like that, but then I was too young even to really respond to the tongue he slipped me at the end of the evening and I skipped going by his room. Hopefully, he doesn’t remember the incident too clearly as I had a different name and hair color at the time.
But for years afterwards, I continued to scour used book store racks for books by Harlan Ellison. I loved his ability to slip in and out of different genres, to weave genres together, and to remain angry and righteous for so many years. At a certain point, I gave up looking, however, because only a few of his books could be found and I had read all of those. Today, all of Harlan Ellison’s works from 1958 to the present are being rereleased in a series of omnibus editions. I dislike the omnibus format because the hardcovers are heavy and I’m likely to have read at least one of the sections in every one. But I believe that Harlan Ellison is one of the best living authors writing in the English language and I think he ought to get paid. Watch for the Edgeworks series finally once again coming to racks for new books.