It is amusing I suppose. As a Minnesota taxpayer, I believe the law Craig was convicted of should (and will) be declared unconstitutional by the Minnesota Supreme Court. In fact, the Court has taken this even beyond a mere speech issue in a previous case:
In State v. Bryant, The Court ruled that two men actually engaging in sex in a department store restroom had an expectation of privacy. I may or may not agree with the ruling. I would, however, apply it to the Craig case in a heartbeat. Craig was not accused of even engaging in sex. He may or may not have used a procedure for attracting sexual partners. He pled guilty to an overbroad and vague charge of "disturbing the peace"
Senator Larry Craig, whatever his personal failings may be, will likely put an end to the sting operation at the airport. As I do not consider this a legitimate use of the "police power" of the state, I support the overturning of Craig's guilty plea (and a ruling that the law itself is unconstitutional based on the MN Constitution and precedent) It will likely happen. Senator Craig will be one of the most ironic figures in recent political history.
http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/freespeech/...acluamicus.pdf
JT