was apple wrong to discount their phones so soon after overcharging for them?

from times online

Apple sued for $1m over $200 iPhone discount

Apple guilty of 'price discrimination, underselling, discrimination in rebates and other wrongdoings,' alleges an irked iPhone buyer
Rhys Blakely

An angry iPhone buyer is suing Apple for $1 million (£490,000) after the company slashed the price of the device by $200 only 68 days after its US launch.

Dongmei Li, of New York, who waited "for hours" to buy a 4GB version of the iPhone in July three days after its debut, is accusing Apple of "price discrimination, underselling, discrimination in rebates, deceptive actions and other wrongdoings," according to a filing by her attorney, C Jean Wang, of Wang Law Offices.

Apple cut the price of the 8GB model of the iPhone to $399 from $599 last month, triggering an outcry from consumers who had stumped up the higher price for the much-hyped gadget.

At the same time it phased out the lower-specification 4GB model.
Background

* Apple’s iPhone comes with the ring of overconfidence

* Apple warns iPhone owners against 'unlocking'

* Apple issues warning over rival iPhone software sites

* O2 finds Apple revenue-sharing to its taste

* SEC calls Jobs in Apple stock option case

Apple iPhone: Analysis

The disruptive power of Apple iPhone is underlined by the panic the launch has triggered among the UK's mobile operators

* Vodafone fires volley of music at iPhone



Under an existing return policy, Apple refunded the $200 difference for those who bought the phone within 14 days of the discount.

Later, in a bid to make peace with irked early iPhone adopters, it offered a $100 credit to purchasers at Apple stores.

However, according to Ms Li’s lawsuit, filed in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, the discount “injured” early purchasers such as herself because they cannot resell their iPhones “for the same profit as later purchasers”.

The high-profile iPhone has proven a magnet for lawsuits – some with more apparent merit than others – since Day 1.

Only hours after Steve Jobs unveiled the gadget in January, Apple was sued by Cisco, which claimed that it owned the “iphone” brand. The two technology companies settled out of court.

In August Herbert Kliegerman filed a class-action lawsuit in New York State Supreme Court, claiming that the company had misled consumers.

He filed the action after being hit with a $2,000 bill for roaming charges when he used his iPhone outside the US, which he claimed he was told would not be imposed.

Two other lawsuits making their way through US courts contend that users cannot change the iPhone’s battery.

Ms Li's filing against the iPhone reasons that "market conditions did not require Apple to change its price”.

It adds: "iPhone was selling very well because Apple's stocks were increasing since August 16, 2007, and rose as high as $144.16 on September 4, 2007, the day before Apple announced that it was cutting the price of iPhone."

Announcing the $100 credit note last month, Mr Jobs, the chief executive of Apple, acknowledged that his company had failed to look after iPhone customers.

He said on the Apple website: “Even though we are making the right decision to lower the price of iPhone, and even though the technology road is bumpy, we need to do a better job taking care of our early iPhone customers as we aggressively go after new ones with a lower price.”

anyone who jumps and buys new stuff like that the day it comes out should be expecting that anyway

I think personally apple has gone alitle too far with the whole "i" thing. I heard they were gonna make a whole damn car, and a far s price gouging, yeah, what krl said, if somone is stupid enough to wait in line for days and drop serious cash over some kind of gadget then they shold expect to be bit in he ass.

I hope this suit is laughed out of court. It should be.

JT

I was irritated by all the Apple phone hype. I got one as a gift when they came out and I have never used it yet.