I'm not sure that you were listening properly either, B. The fact that electronic makes a huge amount of new things possible isn't disproven by there being a lot of the same, the two aren't even really related. Your counter is explained simply by human nature; it says nothing about electronics as a musical tool.
I hadn't yet offered my opinion on it 'killing live music', but I'll say now - so? Music is a genre of art with a very odd presentation and distribution threshold. If I go make an article of clothing, do something cool with my makeup, decorate a barbie or paint some psychedelic picture to hang in my room - well, anyone put into the right circumstances can and will see it, and appreciate it for however much or little it is worth. But when someone is a musician, suddenly, they need a stage and an audience to even begin presenting their works? You're either a minor celebrity, or you're nothing - which leads to a lot of credit being withheld where it is due, and vice versa. It's a very difficult field to enter into, and exclusivism is never good for art.
Recorded music and recently filesharing have done a lot to help this, and electronic genres have embraced these means to make music something that anyone can get started in. Instead of demanding that you're one of an event's major shows, they put something together, put the file up somewhere public, maybe mail it to some DJs they know, and let things run their course. This way it's easy and relatively cheap to get started, and you get judged and appreciated based on the quality of your work rather than opportunities provided by where you live and whether there's accessible stages around.
Now, you can attach sentimental or aesthetic value to 'gigs' and concerts and all that rock and roll stuff and not be wrong, but this method isn't bad either. And, frankly, culture doesn't get 'killed' unless people set their sights on something they like better. It's about what instrumental music isn't doing as much as about anything electronic music is.
Bookmarks