Although the clip is said to be from 2006..I just saw it.. so discuss.
Although the clip is said to be from 2006..I just saw it.. so discuss.
what a fucking idiot. I hate that guy.
May not agree with the positions involved, but the logic is sensible enough. The Administration acted based on advice that GC didn't apply, and then later was told it did. Fixing the problems that raised is a perk of being the guys in charge, but more importantly not being able to retroactively tinker would seriously limit the effectiveness of the Administration, as it would be forever scared of passing anything (even stuff we all wanted) in case some time in the distant future it was ruled as criminal.
It doesn't change GC though - The Hague could still indict once he ceases to be head of state, but of course it won't. Politics is allowed to engineer itself perfect hindsight, or we'd all be still waiting for someone to make cars legal.
Bookmarks