No... sorry not an erotic topic. It wasn't hard to fool you though
Woman charged over 'gothic kittens' smh
An American woman who marketed "gothic kittens" with ear, neck and tail piercings over the internet has been charged with animal cruelty and conspiracy.
... she will plead not guilty, and that she didn't see any difference between piercing a cat and piercing a human.
....a vice president for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the group that alerted authorities, called the piercings "barbaric".
"There's no excuse for inflicting such pain on an animal that's the size of your palm,"
Is this an out of proportion whinge by PETA nuts or is this a fair response to prevent animal cruelty? My opinion is that if it:then it's OK even if it is nothing much more than a vanity, ego or control thing by the kitty's owner. I wouldn't do it to one myself though.
- causes no more pain than getting your ears pierced or is done under anaesthetic with no lasting pain
- is hygenically done and appropriate care given ongoing
- causes no impediment or lasting discomfort
Otherwise it's not OK at all.
Don't they staple or tag all sorts of animals already?
Bookmarks