Originally Posted by
Amelia G
I think minimum wage in California is going up to $9/hr some time next year, but I think minimum wage is a pretty useless concept.
99% of Americans need a better economy right now. Almost everyone's lives are slipping and, even people whose wages have skyrocketed can't meet the rising costs of things like gas and healthcare.
At least in California, where there (a) are a lot of creative people and (b) is easy access to illegal workers from Mexico and Canada, minimum wage just screws small businesses. As creative jobs often pay in a piecework fashion, the rate can easily slip below minimum without the artist even noticing. For example, I stopped doing gallery shows because I realized that I was not even making minimum wage on them and honestly Forrest Black and I have had better sales at such shows than many. Here is how the math would break out for a fine art nude gallery print in a group show:
Customer pays $900
Gallery gets $360 of that
Model gets $108 of that
Framing probably cost $58
another $58 x 2 for framing two that don't sell
another $90 for printing three images
Total take home $168
Not counting the time spent shooting or expenses on the day of the shoot, just counting what the gallery portion consumes, that probably means:
18 hours selecting/formatting/printing/framing three images
2 hours spent at gallery during setup and hanging
7 hours spent at gallery show
That would come out to $3.11 per hour for time spent actually working on the gallery show, not counting time spent schmoozing to get included in the show, or time spent shooting. But, if I wanted to hire someone to assist with some of those tasks because there are only so many hours in the day, of course I would need to pay them more than $3.11. In this case, partly because I do have people who work on some of those tasks for me and I can't afford to lose bank, that just means I usually do not participate in gallery shows.
But, if the galleries were required to charge $2,700 per print, so I could make minimum wage on my work there, I think they would probably just have fewer sales. So telling the galleries that they must pay artists at least minimum wage would just mean that they would either (a) not do what they do or (b) pay under the table. And everyone knows that under the table deals suck because then there is no recourse when some gallery (or other business) owner does not pay.
Bookmarks