Is Lady GaGa Naked Rolling Stone Cover Remotely Scandalous?

[The Newswire]

Singer/songwriter Lady GaGa appears on the cover of the current issue of Rolling Stone. The cover is shot by photographer David LaChapelle...

Read the full article

[Nos]

No more scandalous than the "Gossip Girl'" cover people flipped over.

I *heart* Americans

[Amelia G]

No more scandalous than the "Gossip Girl'" cover people flipped over.

I *heart* Americans

I missed that one, although I confess to thinking some of the Gossip Girl billboards in LA were hot in a vanilla sort of way. Got a link?

I blame my degeneracy on having gone to school overseas.

[Nos]

http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/26764459

I thought the cover was very sexy .... but not "scandalous". People wrote in all upset about it saying it looked like a porno.

Lady Gaga's cover is amazing ... I really adore her round ass!

[Amelia G]

http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/26764459

I thought the cover was very sexy .... but not "scandalous". People wrote in all upset about it saying it looked like a porno.

Lady Gaga's cover is amazing ... I really adore her round ass!

I agree with you. Terry Richardson did an interesting and creative job with that, to my eye anyway.

[keiko]

Every time someone famous gets a little naked people flip. I don't know how it stays scandalous, I've gotten kind of bored with it myself. Maybe it's because I've gotten used to nudity, or because the hype is so repetitive. They can't say anything about the pictures except "Scandalous photos of So-and-so. So-and-so scantily clad in -magazine-." Or maybe I grew out of the "shock and awe" of the human body after the second grade.

These pictures are awesomely hot. Incredible photography and I <33 the fantastic scene.

~K

[Mindgames]

To borrow from Dennis Pennis;

"So, Lady Gaga - if it wasn't gratuitous in any way, and was tastefully done, would you consider keeping your clothes on for the camera?"


(btw - the second G in Gaga is small, as in the q in KFC)

[Amelia G]

To borrow from Dennis Pennis;

"So, Lady Gaga - if it wasn't gratuitous in any way, and was tastefully done, would you consider keeping your clothes on for the camera?"


(btw - the second G in Gaga is small, as in the q in KFC)

and doh.

[funkatron]

Uh, no. Remember that Janet Jackson handbra cover? C'mon.

Tittyballs.

[Amelia G]

Uh, no. Remember that Janet Jackson handbra cover? C'mon.

Tittyballs.

Tittyballs!

[Brigeyboo]

not so much, It's not like she's doing lewd acts or anything. She's a little naked (not even so much) so it's really not that big of a deal. If anyone has a problem with it then they are trying to start shit over nothing.

[incog]

It must be scandalous because I like it.

[KessM]

looks harmless to me -_-

[malcolm]

wait......lady gaga is naked in some form of print media?................fuck i wish i had a job so i could buy a copy.

[ROGIZOID]

Yep.
I'd do her.

[Vix]

She is Not nakkid ( i bloody wish)
therefor NOT scandalous, BUT.... i like her, and
I give my double thumbs up and Lick approval

[LeilaHazlett]

I don't know who she is but I saw that cover and the only thing I thought about it was how horribly unattractive the hair/makeup on her was. Other than being a shitty cover photo I don't see how it's scandalous.

[Raza]

It's kinda meh, 'fyouaskme. The hairstyle succeeds at being unusual (if not immediately appealing), but other than that it's just another 'perfect plain' nude chick with hair that's lighter than her complexion and some photoshopped bubbles posing as a variant fig leaf, kids' cartoon style.

If she started a scandal with it though, good for her.

[MusicVideoSurfer]

If interested, check out the youtube video titled "Lady Gaga Joins Twisted Sister", funny stuff . . .

[Raza]

No profile link. I coulda sworn I smelled bot.

[inox]

I'd poke her face.

[FedorasBox]

Keep that shit coming!