
Originally Posted by
ForrestBlack
We the People of the Fraggle Rock, in Order to form a more perfect Union... ugh...
Over the last few years, I have heard a lot of people complain about what sort of example or role model various public figures were providing for the children of our society. I really don't understand this at all. If a musician writes songs for adults to relate to, about adult issues, why should they be pressured into some sort of Mr. Rogers role for the sake of the supposed greater good? Is it not enough that they appeal to the audience that they are supposed to? Why are we trying to dumb down and/or candy coat everything in our various cultures to the very lowest common denominator? Why must everything be built for ages 6 through 12? If I were a parent, yes, I would do my best to steer my kid(s) towards the right things. I'd teach them about all the great cultural heros and try to instill an appreciation for goodness, but I would be under no illusion that there would be things that were built for me to appreciate and not them. At least not at their age anyway. America, at least, is supposed to be a bit of a melting pot, or stew as some people have argued, and that requires diversity. In a diverse environment, it is our freedom to choose to appreciate that which we enjoy and that which is good for us, and it is also our responsibility to respect or at least tolerate that which we do not feel directly appeals to us. Sure, if something is really really wrong, we can speak up against it, but some of the things people seem to speak up against just don't make any sense to me. Should Marilyn Manson be a role model for a six year old? Come on, I don't think that was his goal. I don't think that's his audience. I am really sick of having freedom, liberty, and speech attacked in the name of protecting children. This is not one kindergarten under God, with cookies and naptime for all.
Bookmarks